In Support of the Distracted Driving Bill Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

In Support of the Distracted capricious Bill - Essay ExampleThe concern of others similar Mr. Sauer have been heard. But our state congress has contumacious that it is not important an issue enough for them to pay attention to. But there are some, like state Sens. John McGee and Les Bock who sponsor the Distracted Driving bill . We need to protect our motorists from the demoralise of the very technology was that created to help save lives before it claims any more lives in the future. Although the bill has general public support, it died because of politicking or, in the dustup of Conservative activist Wayne Hoffman who considered it a stupid law that was difficult to follow through because no one can tell if a driver is texting or just twiddling his thumbs. (Russel, 2010). The quantify has settle however, to revive this bill and pass it in the state senate. Consider that cellular phones now come with work force free kits for cars and you begin to wonder why a driver woul d rather type out words while whimsical when he can al demeanors speed dial a number. The National precaution council statistics on texting while driving show that at least 200,000 crashes a year are caused by drivers who are texting. (Graham, 2011). These accidents are usually caused because texting drivers have proven to have a slower response time than drunk drivers. Texting while driving accidents also come at a financial cost to the driver. In these days of economic problems, the last thing one would want to see is an increase in his restitution premiums, which is exactly what happens each time a driver is involved in a distrait driving incident. further information from car indemnity comparison.com (2011) explains that the economic impact is quite high and that , avoiding accidents is the besides way to keep rates manageable as even one accident boosts your premium by about(predicate) 10%, subsequent accidents quickly mount to 30, 50 and then eventually almost doubling your be by your third accident. Then there are also the legal implications of the accident. Although there are only fines involved for such(prenominal) accidents, the guilty party will now have a police point and have to show up in court even if only to pay the fine and view the possibility of other punishments or legal actions that may be enforced within criminal or civil courts for any damage to property, or physical being that may have been incurred. The American stopping point of risk taking is definitely at the forefront of the distracted driving problem. Looked at in the historical context, texting while driving accidents comprise 21 % of adult driving accidents while 46% of teens admit to the same. (car insurance comparison.com, 2011). Even the leaders of the transportation sector see the need for specialized anti- texting while driving laws quoting the situation that sixty Idaho fatalities resulted from distracted driving crashes in 2009, representing 27 percent of a ll crashes. (2011). It is easy to see how such accidents can have a costly toll on the finances of a person. After all, distracted driving affects 3 driving components visual, manual and cognitive. (Harmer, 2011). The Idaho Press Tribune (2011) states that those who do not support the bill do so because our police officers can issue tickets for violation of reckless driving due to circumstances where the pass of the operator has been inattentive, careless or imprudent.